For years, human rights groups have criticized the US Department of Justice for discriminating against Chinese scientists. Today, the new report provides information that can read some of their comments.
The program of learning, published by the Committee of 100, an organization of prominent Chinese and American leaders, found that people from China were more likely to commit crimes than others under the Espionage Act. Less he must be judged.
The report’s author, Andrew C. Kim, a lawyer and travel specialist at South Texas College of Law Houston, said: “The first question this researcher is trying to answer is whether Asian-Americans are treated differently on suspicion of espionage.” “The answer to that question is yes. “
The survey, which focuses on intelligence cases brought by the US from 1996 to 2020, found that half of all prosecutors were accused of stealing secrets that could benefit China. This is very low compared to the figures given by US officials to confirm that the China Initiative is responsible for justice.
According to the report, 46% of those accused of complying with the Economic Espionage Act were charged with activities that would benefit Chinese or corporations, while 42% of their defendants were charged with stealing secrets that would benefit American businesses.
These figures strongly contradict the message the Department of Justice is sending to the China Initiative, which was established in 2018 to crack down on spies. The department has stated publicly — for example, in the first line of its China Initiative page– that 80% of the charges against China would benefit China, showing “the theft is so large that it represents one of the largest economic transactions in human history,” according to FBI director Christopher Wray. he explained in 2020.
Since 2019, the program has been researching mainly professional researchers.
“Strong evidence of a judge with little evidence”
The report drew on the analysis of state court records, as well as journalists from the Department of Justice, in all financial cases of the Economic Espionage Act between 1996 and 2020. Cardozo Law Review, which was written until 2016.
Cases of theft of “trade secrets” and “surveillance spies” were both incorporated, in cases of “spies” that required proof of “foreign cooperation” as well as increased penalties. (The two groups are only part of the China Initiative;
Because demographics and citizenship were not included in the court proceedings, Kim used the names as a tribal representative, and she used Google while the names, such as Lee and Park, were in conflict. As a citizen, Kim also pointed out that the media often portray the protagonist as “foreigner,” thus assuming that the protagonists are all citizens unless first mentioned.