Wary US has been forced to rely on the Taliban to pose threats to Afghanistan


Zalmay Khalilzad, a former US ambassador and special envoy to Afghanistan, was silent for a few days after the Taliban seized Kabul and riots erupted.

But later this week, he praised the group’s leaders for a series of letters promising to allow Afghan people to leave the country if they wanted to, even if the last US military left the country this week.

“Words are good. We, our partners, as well as the rest of the world, will retain them, ”Khalilzad wrote.

His comments highlight the fragile, difficult and tense alliance that has been going on between the Taliban and Washington since the Islamic militant army. fled to Kabul – and how the US is trying to use the legitimate hope of the world to attract the next Taliban government.

In the weeks since President Ashraf Ghani’s supervisors acted he fainted, Washington and other foreign governments, many of whom had already taken up the Taliban as political analysts, were forced to contact Islamic leaders to formulate. route to Kabul airport to their citizens and tens of thousands of their Afghan counterparts.

The growth of international cooperation was reflected in a dubious journey Secretary William Burns, CIA chief, in Kabul to meet with a Taliban leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar last week to discuss ways to save people. The alliance has helped more than 114,000 people flee Kabul in the two weeks following the Taliban’s capture of the city, according to White House figures.

“The Taliban have taken place outside Kabul airport,” said an Indian official, who operates several airlines. “Everyone had to work with the Taliban to some extent to get their people out – which was important in every country.”

Afghan refugees arrive at Pristina International Airport in Kosovo on Sunday © Reuters

Jen Psaki, a press secretary at the White House, defended Washington’s high-profile alliance with Taliban leaders, saying the militants were “not a group we trust; they are not our allies” but insisted that “co-operation was needed to continue the rescue operation”.

However, US officials and other foreign governments say future relations with Taliban-led Afghanistan in Afghanistan depend on how the Islamic State uses its new powers to establish its own government, which is expected this week. A meeting between the G7, Nato, representatives of the UN Security Council, Qatar and Turkey will be held in Doha on Monday to discuss the issue.

Whether the Taliban will allow foreign nationals and aggrieved Afghans to leave air travel will be tested once.

Foreign governments will monitor the agency’s performance closely February 2020 agreement and former US President Donald Trump to crack down on terrorist groups operating from Afghanistan and preserve some of the things that have happened over the past 20 years. Ensuring all rights and the liberation of women’s rights.

“Nothing has been promised to the Taliban,” Antony Blinken, US Secretary of State, asked NBC on Sunday.

“We have made it clear – not just ourselves, the country and the world around us – we have made it clear that there are high hopes for the Taliban to move forward if they can have any kind of relationship with the rest of the world.”

When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, no western country recognized it as a legitimate government. Taliban representatives were not allowed to take the UN seat in Afghanistan.

But Washington has shattered hopes that the Taliban government would be accepted by other countries if it could prevent the country from becoming a Muslim shrine as was the case with al-Qaeda before the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

While U.S. officials say they will not suspend talks in Afghanistan soon after their departure, many experts believe the U.S. was ready to negotiate a counter-terrorism operation with Taliban insurgents.

“The long-term relationship over the next few months and years will be shaped by anti-terrorism policies – an attempt to ensure that Afghan soil is not used to prepare for or cause threats to the West and the US,” said Rudra Chaudhuri, senior lecturer at King’s College London department of War Study.

“This is the first, most intimate relationship in the United States with the Taliban.”

U.S. military officials and Taliban leaders have already shown solidarity with the people. Speaking to reporters after a few hours of suicide at the airport gate last week killed at least 100 Afghans and 13 U.S. military personnel, General Kenneth McKenzie, the US Central Command chief, admitted that Washington was using “the Taliban as a defense as best we could”.

The US shared information with the Taliban and discussed expanding security measures around the airport and closing roads, McKenzie said. “We hope that other threats have deterred them… We have been doing this since the 14th [of August], “He added.

However, the deadly attack on the airport, which Washington has Isis-K case, raised questions about the Taliban’s desire for leadership and their ability to prevent the country from becoming a terrorist capital again. U.S. intelligence in Afghanistan can also be disrupted without shoes on the ground.

Jake Sullivan, a White House security adviser, said the Taliban were “strongly urged to unite” by US support for “foreign relations”. economic system, its availability in storage ”.

He added that the US could continue to fight the Taliban if US citizens were threatened.

But even though the Taliban agreed to fight terrorism, Washington could not recognize his government or do so without the help of the Taliban. European sponsors, many of whom did not like the band’s return to power.

“Access to development assistance, and international approval, is the only card that foreign countries have,” Chaudhuri said. “They won’t just leave this card easily or soon.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *